Monthly Archives: August 2012

Student Loans: I’m ready to place blame.

Student loans. Two words I escaped in undergrad but responsibly and begrudgingly chose to assume for my graduate degree (currently in progress). I’ve blogged about student loans in the past, but now that I am actively going through the process, my convictions have strengthened.

My decision, after much contemplation and research, to assume student loan debt was not an easy one but necessary if I wanted to make that “investment” into my own future. (Note: I do not plan to “Teach for America” or work for the Feds, so it’s safe to assume that I will pay back every penny with sufficient 6.8 % interest.)

I could NOT believe how easy the application and approval process is. You fill out a few questions about yourself and your financial state (and at my age, both of these are minimal), submit, wait, and APPROVED! You then complete a 15-minute webinar on loans, sign a “digital signature” and your loan is assigned to a master company who you deal with directly.  The money is directly deposited into your account. After doing this, you don’t really hear from your loan host, except for a few ‘holidays’.

This year, I received a “birthday card” (via email)  from my student loan host…on the wrong day. They don’t even have my date of birth correct in their database. Fabulous record keeping. Sure, this is a minor feat, but when you can’t record-keep correctly, it makes me question what else you can’t do correctly.

Then, just this week, I received a “Welcome Back!” email from my loan host as well. Please see the ‘circled’ sections below:

A few things to consider before we move on:
There are subsidized loans, which allow you to hold off on accumulating interest until graduation day; and unsubsidized loans, where interest begins accumulating from the day you accept the loan. With unsubsidized, you can either a) pay the interest during your time in school or, b) have the interest funneled into the final loan amount and end up paying interest on interest. (initially, you can choose subsidized over unsubsidized, but subsidized maxes out earlier than unsubsidized)
Being the stingy, OCD person who would rather spend that money on something else, that I am, decided to take ‘option A’ in regards to my unsubsidized loans to ultimately reduce the amount I have to pay back. You would NOT believe how difficult this process is.

Let’s talk about how unrealistic student loans are.
Where in real life are you expected to make a monthly payment without receiving a bill or some sort of “payment voucher” etc?
Where in real life can you REDUCE THE TERM OF YOUR LOAN because you’ve gone 10 years with on-time payments? (I’ve yet to meet a mortgage lender who says “Thanks for being on-time for the last few years. We’ve wiped your slate clean, the house is yours!”

We saw with the mortgage industry what happens when you assume more debt that your asset is worth. So why are we allowing students to pull out the maximum [graduate] loan amount of $20,500/year when tuition can often only cost $5k-$6k? Imagine how low payments would be or how quickly you could pay off loans if only the bare minimum was accepted?

Another problem: deferment. I fully support our armed servicemen and women and agree with deferment while they are fighting for our freedoms overseas. I do not support deferment for those experiencing “financial hardship”. If you are unemployed, you can defer for up to three years. Really? I guess this is better than allowing unemployment benefits to be put towards loans, but still. How is this even an option? Maybe you should have selected a degree in something other than Art History or Gender Studies through Social Work.

Finally, cancellation. Whose idea was this? I would love to know so I could take them for a long walk on a short plank. Like I mentioned above, loan amounts can be taken out to far exceed the cost of education. Now there is an option to cancel loans for a variety of reasons. If you plan to cancel the loan based on “service”, don’t disperse a loan at all. Simply don’t charge tuition for said person. Allowing them to take out sometimes 4x the loan amount and then canceling the entire thing…???Heaven only knows what we’ve actually paid for in tax dollars.

The last thing I am implying is that students are not responsible for their own loans. They absolutely are. But, back to the email….
Why would you send emails saying “You don’t need to do anything!” when in reality, you do?
Why would you cease correspondence after signing loans until 6 months after graduation when the payments begin?
Why would you omit the fact that you can start making payments on your loan amount starting the day you assume them?
Why would you allow telephone operators to say payments cannot be made over the phone and make online account set up extremely time-consuming in an effort to discourage early payment?

I’ll tell you why: Because student loans are a feeder into the dependency of a nanny state.

With student loan debt at an all-time high, approaching nearly $1trillion dollars, we should be scared. We should be making moves.
We should absolutely encourage people to begin paying money back immediately upon the commencement of the loan. Even if it’s only $10 a month, some sort of effort, some sort of action should be promoted if it won’t be required.
We should ONLY allow tuition costs paid directly to the school + a book allowance to minimize repayments and loan withdrawals.

The student loan program is entirely broken. It is only working for that small percentage that actually pays, or intends to pay, back the full amount + interest. I call for an entire moratorium on the federal student loans industry. Otherwise, cost will only increase as those of us who make every effort to repay them are left with the burden of compensating for those who do not.

Gold Dome Power Players vs. Local Bloggers

Back in May, I published a post detailing John Albers’ redistricting shenanigans in regards to Brandon Beach and the primary race in Senate District 21. I expressed my support for Brandon Beach in the district based on my personal interactions with him and his plans for Fulton and Cherokee counties. Apparently, this is like armed robbery of a preschool because within hours of my posting, “insiders” were calling people in my circle asking who I was and why I would do such a thing. I’m talking staffers at the Dome, attorneys and other consultants. My personal policy is support the person I think is best for this office. This is not always the incumbent. You would have thought I was the only person on earth to ever go against an incumbent. Imagine Senator Rogers’ surprise when there were a few others who weren’t on his side. Unfortunately, I succumbed to political pressure and took the blog down. This is also against my policy and what this blog stands for and for that, I apologize.

Now, there are a few things to understand. It’s been two years since I worked on the Albers Senate campaign and I sealed the bad memories solely on the fact that I have had no issue succeeding since I left Mr. Albers and figured he would self-destruct on his own. Even though I did not sign a confidentiality agreement, I originally planned to just “let it go”. And since I worked on his campaign, I know some of the mischief he encountered in a last-ditch effort to win his campaign- this is all besides the point but tuck it away for conclusion-drawing later. But since then, John Albers has made numerous attempts to discredit my reputation and defame my character. (You can read why Mr. Albers doesn’t care for me here, here, here, here, here or here.) I also spent a legislative session at the Capitol this Spring where Mr. Albers consistently and maliciously spent numerous hours bad mouthing me to aides, other Senators and staffers and accusing me of stalking him to any one that I networked with. Yes, you read the correctly: stalking. What Mr. Albers didn’t know was that I have plenty of friends down at the Gold Dome who cued me into what he was doing. At first, I was upset, as any young girl trying to start her career would be. How could an old man use his political power to try to sway others’ opinions of me? I also heard other initiatives that Mr. Albers took in an effort to get me to stop blogging, but none of them worked. I know he doesn’t do this with the AJC or the former Beacon Newspaper. Did he just think he could behave like this because I’m young? After some thought, it hit me: John Albers is scared of me and by doing this, he was attempting to disgrace me by making me look untrustworthy and misguided. As I realized what was happening and I heard some of the reactions, I realized that I had more fans at the Capitol than Mr. Albers and I was just a little ‘ol intern. I couldn’t help but giggle when someone said “Get real! You certainly have better taste than that!”. After a few months, however, this warranted action and Mr Albers received a certified letter explaining what slander is (in case he didn’t know) and demanding that he stop, with threat of a lawsuit.
I have not been a saint when it comes to blogging about Albers, it’s true. But because I helped get him elected, I feel obligated to hold him accountable for his decisions at the Dome, not to mention, I grew up in the district and many of my friends and family reside there. After the first blog I posted, John called me and asked me to take it down. I would not, simply because nothing I stated was untrue. I have always stuck to the issues and legislation when it comes to my assertions about ‘ol Johnny (except when I said I thought he was going to shoot someone out of a cannon) and I have encouraged him to correct me when I am wrong. So far, I have not misstated the facts and he has not attempted to correct me. He has resorted to childish measures and his actions are simply unacceptable. Shame on you, Senator. The people of District 56 and the citizens of Georgia deserve better than someone who will resort to slander and throwing their weight around when challenged by a youthful blogger who is simply demanding responsible government and adequate representation.

Woe to that nation whose literature is cut short by the intrusion of force. This is not merely interference with freedom of the press but the sealing up of a nation’s heart, the excision of its memory.”